Why should apartment owners be vulnerable to the loss of their home in a way that owners of freestanding houses never are, asks Cathy Sherry.
A landmark Federal Court ruling puts the impetus on politicians and regulators to decide what is in the public interest, writes Justin O'Brien.
Revelations of children working for less than a dollar a day to make Australian footballs have rekindled an old debate, Justine Nolan writes.
The Gillard government's announcement that it won't push ahead with the referendum for constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples comes as no surprise, writes Andrew Lynch.
Indigenous women are often invisible in the administration of justice, posing a serious obstacle to rights to self-determination, UNSW law professor Megan Davis has told a United Nations panel.
As defeat looms for marriage equality in Federal Parliament, momentum is building for change in the states, writes George Williams.
Appointing a new small business commissioner without legislative teeth is futile, argues Frank Zumbo.
The Airport Economist Tim Harcourt goes into bat for his much maligned field and finds the future is far from bleak.
Retiring should be happening later, not earlier, and and we should use the policy levers we have to make this happen, writes John Piggott.
Politicians should serve in only one tier of government at a time. Doing otherwise can give rise to a conflict of interest, writes George Williams.