The majority of Australian parents are susceptible to influence by vaccine messages from political and medical leaders, according to a new study by researchers at UNSW Sydney.
Elissa Zhang, a medical student from UNSW Medicine, was the lead author on the paper, which was published in BMJ Open today.
“Our study has uncovered important new knowledge about a ‘silent majority’ of parents who are susceptible to vaccine messages from political and medical leaders,” said Ms Zhang.
“We measured the vaccination views of participants before and after viewing vaccine messages from medical and political leaders.
“For this study, we showed over 400 Australian parents of children under 5 years negative vaccine-related messages from the United States President Donald Trump and Australian Senator Pauline Hanson. A positive vaccine message was shown from former Australian Medical Association president Dr Michael Gannon,” said Ms Zhang.
Prior to viewing the messages, only 2% of respondents had fixed anti-vaccination views, and more than 20% had fixed pro-vaccination views. These parents with fixed positive or negative views on vaccination did not change their views after hearing messages from public figures.
It was the remaining 76% of parents, who generally accepted vaccination, that were susceptible to influence by public figures. When the researchers measured participant views after viewing the video, the group who expressed a general acceptance of vaccination were over twice as likely compared to ‘fixed-view’ parents to report increased vaccine hesitancy after viewing negative vaccine messages. Positive messages from Dr Gannon did not significantly increase hesitancy.
Senior author, Professor Raina MacIntyre of the Kirby Institute, said that this study looked at parental attitudes to vaccination through a different lens than other researchers.
“We defined a silent majority of parents who are susceptible to be influenced by political leaders who voice views on vaccination.
“Research has previously focused only on the margins of a spectrum of parents, investing in health promotion directed at a small vaccine-hesitant group at the fringe. What we showed is that the large group of parents in the middle of the spectrum are susceptible to vaccine messaging from public figures, and we must not take their acceptance of vaccines for granted.
“We tend to focus our resources on health promotion only for vaccine hesitant parents, but should not forget parents who do vaccinate. They are also important for health promotion. We also reiterate the importance of medical leaders countering anti-vaccination messaging and being proactive in promotion of vaccination to parents.”
“The study highlights the potential of political leaders to influence parents, and their obligation to use their public platform responsibly, to ensure the gains of decades of vaccination programs are not undone,” Professor MacIntyre said.